Register free! 
SC Cases - Judgement
[ 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 ]  

 
First | Prev | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | Next | Last
Documents Found: 6595   
Title Forum  Year
Siddeshwar V. Kittur vs H.T. Gurumurthy [LexDoc Id : 372744]
HC (Bombay) 2008
Maya Shenoy vs CIT Computation of capital gains-Cost of Acquisition: Cost of demolished superstructure-The assessee demolished the superstructure before handing over plot to the developer. The cost of old superstructure was allowable as deduction for co [LexDoc Id : 372124]
ITAT (Hyderabad) 2008
Saf Yeast Co. (P) Ltd. vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. [LexDoc Id : 371191]
HC (Allahabad) 2008
Tamil Nadu Road Development Co. Ltd. vs ACIT, ITO and Anr. Rate of depreciation-Road-AY 2003-04 and AY 2004-05. The "road" not being a "plant", the depreciation on road was to be allowed at the rate applicable to "building".

S [LexDoc Id : 368262]
ITAT (Chennai) 2008
Kaushal Kishore Agrawalla vs State Bank of India [LexDoc Id : 365821]
HC (Orissa) 2008
ITO vs Satyawati Devi Verma

Satyawati Devi Verma vs ITO
Accrual of capital gains-Agreement to sell vis-a-vis sale-AY 1996-97. The assessee had inherited a plot under will of his aunt. The plot was under possession of a trust and she initiated court proceedings for [LexDoc Id : 365356]
ITAT (Delhi) 2008
Vinir Engg. (P) Ltd. vs DCIT Deduction on: Actual payment-Interest payable to financial institution, Re-Scheduling of interest by means of fresh loan-AY 1997-98. The interest payable on loan from Karnataka State Financial Corporation was rescheduled into a fresh loan. It was deemed payment. The inte [LexDoc Id : 365140]
HC (Karnataka) 2008
Ahluwallia and Associates vs ITO Credit for TDS-Tax deducted at source but not paid by deductor-AY 2004-05. The tax was deducted at source but not paid by the deductor. The said amount could not be recovered from the assessee deductee because of [LexDoc Id : 362631]
ITAT (Ahmedabad) 2008
Saraswathi Agencies vs Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal [LexDoc Id : 361749]
HC (Madras) 2008
Prakash Industries Ltd. vs ACIT

ACIT vs Prakash Industries Ltd.
Depreciation allowance-Plant for generating power-The AO had allowed depreciation on power generating plant in later year. Assessee entitled to depreciation in this year also.

S.32 of the In [LexDoc Id : 361638]
ITAT (Delhi) 2008
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. vs Yuvraj Shalikram Rewde and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 361402]
HC (Bombay) 2008
International Land Dev. (P) Ltd. vs DCIT Provisional attachment of property-Modification of order of provisional attachment-AY 2000-01 to 2006-07. The assessments were made under s.153A. The movable and immovable properties including bank accounts were provisionally attache [LexDoc Id : 360431]
HC (Delhi) 2008
DCIT vs Gopalan Enterprise India (P) Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 360320]
ITAT (Bangalore) 2008
Egon Zehnder International (P) Ltd. vs CIT

DCIT vs Egon Zehnder International (P) Ltd.
[LexDoc Id : 359855]
ITAT (Delhi) 2008
Pfizer Enterprises Sarl vs Cipla Ltd. [LexDoc Id : 359343]
HC (Delhi) 2008
Consulate Constructions vs ITO [LexDoc Id : 359000]
ITAT (Bangalore) 2008
Sarvadeshik Press and Ors. vs Usman Ghani and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 358669]
HC (Delhi) 2008
Splendor Constructions (P) Ltd. vs ITO Short term capital asset vs Long term capital asset-Conversion of stock-in-trade into capital asset, Date of acquisition of capital asset-AY 2003-04. The assessee was engaged in the business of developing and selling real estate. The property acquired in F.Y. 1998-99 alongwith developmen [LexDoc Id : 355118]
ITAT (Delhi) 2008
DCIT vs Sahara India Employees Contributory Provident Fund Exemption: Income of Recognised Provident Fund-Contributions received from more than one entity-AY 2003-04. The assessee was a Recognised Provident Fund, initially formed for employees of a company Sahara India Limited. It also received contribut [LexDoc Id : 355117]
ITAT (Delhi) 2008
ACIT vs Ashok Mehra Income vs Capital receipt-Non compete fee received-AY 2001-02. The fees received from employer company for not taking any direct or indirect employment or providing advice etc. to any other person enga [LexDoc Id : 355115]
ITAT (Delhi) 2008
Cargil India (P) Ltd. vs Narendra Kumar Raychoudhury, Aruna Kumar Chakrabarty and Manas Ranjan Sahoo [LexDoc Id : 354877]
NCDRC 2008
Vimla Stores vs CIT and Anr. Validity of: Levy of interest under s.234B-Absence of order for levy of interest-In absence of any specific order by the AO, no interest could be levied under s.234B

S.234B of the Income Tax Act 1961 [LexDoc Id : 354838]
HC (Patna) 2008
Vaidik Bhakti Sadan Asram vs CIT [LexDoc Id : 353891]
ITAT (Delhi) 2008
Everest Holding Ltd. vs Shyam Kumar Shrivastava and Ors. [LexDoc Id : 353812]
SC 2008
State of Haryana and Ors. vs Shakuntla Devi [LexDoc Id : 353809]
SC 2008
 
First | Prev | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | Next | Last